The Supreme Court of British Columbia -yelp.ca
CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO LIFT CANADA’S COVID MANDATES MOVES AHEAD
by William Thomas
On May 19, 2022, concerned Canadians who had travelled long and far to learn whether a challenge to Trudeau’s Covid mandates would be summarily dismissed, were turned away from Chief Justice Hinkson’s packed courtroom at 800 Smithe Street in Vancouver.
The Canadian Society for the Advancement of Science in Public Policy (CSASPP) is bringing the suit. Their counsel rocked the Crown when she “showed the Court that a comment made in September, 2021, by Dr. Patricia Daly, Chief Medical Health Officer for Vancouver Coastal Health, implied that the injection mandates restricting access to restaurants was actually not intended to curb the spread of infection, that not being a concern of Dr. Daly, but to incentivize injections.”
Prosecutors immediately objected that the manager of the largest public health unit in British Columbia was “not in a position of meaningful authority.”
MOVE TO DISMISS
When this creative inversion of logic failed, Crown counsel moved to dismiss the Plaintiff’s legal challenge, which alleges Section 7 of the Charter guaranteeing all Canadians the right to life, liberty, and security, was undermined. The Crown argued that these rights are not “absolute” and can be suspended if “reasonably necessary.” If this definition stands, all inalienable Canadian freedoms will be reduced to revocable privileges.
Counsel for the CSASPP rebuffed this claim, advising the Court that the evidentiary record already establishes that Dr. Henry’s orders were indeed unreasonable. The gist of the CSASPP arguments can be inferred from their website, which carefully alleges that the mandates “appear to be incrementally draconian.”
To buttress their allegation, the Canadian Society for the Advancement of Science in Public Policy publicly lists:
An astronomically low infection fatality ratio (IFR); testing kits producing false positives for a goat, papaya and a kiwi; dubious exercise of executive powers; the mysterious near disappearance of the common seasonal flu; or an overall lack of an adequate evidential foundation is increasingly being questioned by legal scholars, private citizens, small business owners and their patrons, physicians, nurses, the scientists selling the tests, infectious disease epidemiologists and academics, pharmacists, community leaders, public officials, places of public worship, and civil liberty advocacy groups.
BAD VAX JUJU
If “Covid-infected” papayas aren't enough to make a mockery of the mandates, further evidence of harm caused by these Reich-like measures in Canada is mirrored by US mandates.
And it’s “overwhelming.”
Official data published by the Government of Canada found the triple vaccinated are four-times more likely to be infected with Covid-19, and 2-times more likely to die of Covid-19 than unvaccinated individuals.
Not coincidentally, Canada “has suffered its largest waves of cases, hospitalisations and deaths since the beginning of the pandemic,” reports the Daily Expose. “There would have been less cases, less hospitalisations, and less deaths in 2022 so far if the vaccinated had remained unvaccinated.”
For his part, the Chief Justice “suggested that suspension of Charter rights was not discretionary on the part of the executive,” the CSASPP reports. Layman’s translation: the Prime Minister’s prerogatives does not include suspension of our Charter rights.
QUICKLY…
On adjournment, the Justice advised both parties that he would reserve judgment, while endeavouring to work “expeditiously”.
See also:
DO VACCINE PASSPORTS VIOLATE CANADIAN LAW?
CANADIAN VOTE TO LIFT ALL COVID MANDATES IMMINENT
BC HEALTH OFFICER TO STAND TRIAL FOR MEDICAL FRAUD